Sunday, December 30, 2012

Review of 'GAME OF THRONES'




Royal intrigue, treachery and sex in a medieval England type of fantasy setting.

In the first ten minutes, we see bizarrely mutilated bodies and reanimated corpses, and people speak of a distant wall beyond which lie unknown dangers. The rest of disk one is typical King Arthur style fiction. Even just as a straight tale of medieval adventure, it works for me though I'm hoping the fantasy elements come into play soon. The characters are mostly plausible, the settings convincing, and the plot, to the extent I could follow, was engaging. I finished the second hour eager to see what would come next.

The story shows a fair number of bare breasts and nipples, which some people (including me) enjoy, and occasional simulated intercourse (which does nothing for me.) There is inappropriate brother-sister contact and also frank incest; if that's too much of a turnoff, don't watch the series. Killings and murders abound, but not so frequently and not with so much gore as to become tiresome.


Direwolves are mentioned frequently.  However, these are nothing more than a extinct species, somewhat larger than modern wolves, but not with any magical significance. There is also a videogame called Direwolf20.
  

The music is stirring but forgettable.

The plot is so complicated and the characters so numerous, I had difficulty understanding all of it.  James Hibbard's blog gives the clearest summary I've found. His comments are snarky and very funny.

In spite of the difficulty following all the threads, I give Game of Thrones  ++++.  It gets your pulse up to a run.

No comments:

Post a Comment