Sunday, September 9, 2012

Review of "2012"



This movie portrays the over-hyped Mayan prophecy of the destruction of the world coming true through overheating of the Earth's core causing continental plate movement leading to tsunamis which flood every inch of the Earth's surface, including Mount Everest.  The world's governments have built five giant arks to preserve humanity until the waters recede.  The lives of several people, most of whom manage to get on the arks, is shown in several subplots.

From a scientific standpoint, the movie is ridiculous.  For example, there was a statement about sunspots altering the fundamental properties of subatomic particles. The rapid movements of tectonic plates portrayed, and the picture of a tsunami covering half the Indian subcontinent in about fifteen seconds seem likewise absurd.  Also, arks are relatively low tech.  If governments know about the upcoming flooding, they'd build thousands, not just five.  And the shot of a giraffe being held in a sling and flown by helicopter over the Himalayas is laughable.   The end shot of the sun dawning on a new day is maudlin.

The characters are stereotyped extremes.  You have a self-sacrificing president who gives up his seat on an ark, a greedy Russian businessman and his fat, obnoxious kids, a noble scientist who risks his own welfare to carry forth the truth, and the like.

The music is stirring, and does help the exercise.

The scenes of panic, people running to get a place on the ark, worrying about themselves and their loved ones, trying to persuade officials to do what's right, etc all draw you into the story in spite of the basic plot weaknesses, and the subplots are well enough crafted to keep you from guessing all the outcomes. 

Rating: +++ gets your pulse up as much as a jog.  You could do worse to help your work out.

No comments:

Post a Comment